Wednesday, February 1, 2012

School Board Update

Budget, Honors and a New School Name

Dear Friends

I hope everyone had a wonderful first semester! Here are some updates on important School Board issues. There's a lot going on.
 
The Superintendent announced his proposed $2.4 billion FY2013 Budget on Jan. 12, starting a budget process that ends in May. Among the major items in his proposal were raises for teachers and other employees, more funding for extended learning time for students either during the school year or in the summer, and expansion of Foreign Language in Elementary Schools. Much of the funding increases would go just to pay for a continuing increase in students throughout the county.  

The School Board has a budget work session scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday, Feb. 2, when Board members will discuss amendments they would like to make to the Superintendent's plan. It will be televised on Channel 21 starting at 7 pm. On Feb. 9 the Board will approve an Advertised budget to send to the Board of Supervisors. After the Board of Supervisors determines in April how much the county transfer to FCPS will be, the School Board will approve a final budget in May.

The School Board held hearings on the budget on Monday night, with 46 speakers testifying. Some main themes of the hearings were support for benefits for parent liaisons, expansion of foreign language programs, increased teacher pay, a renovation for Falls Church High School, increased custodial positions, pre-K programs, summer school, budget transparency and later high school start times.

Here's a link to budget information: http://www.fcps.edu/news/fy2013.shtml

Athletic Fees: As in past years, I'd like to eliminate the athletic fees, though the Superintendent's budget still keeps them. I'll be asking my colleagues to support ending them in the upcoming fiscal year. Stayed tuned.

Capital Improvement Program:
On Jan. 26, the Board approved the CIP, which this year includes a plan to build another new elementary school in Mason District. Several of our schools in Mason remain overcrowded, especially Bailey's Elementary School for the Arts and Sciences, with most requiring trailers to use as classrooms. FCPS expects to see continuing increases in student enrollment, particularly in our area. One amendment to the CIP, which I supported, asks the Board of Supervisors to increase the amount the school system can spend in capital costs from the current $155 million a year to $180 million a year so that we can speed up our much-needed renovations. We have a unique opportunity to take advantage of low construction costs and low interest rates if we can increase our capital expenditures.

In discussing the CIP, I pointed to the desperate need for Falls Church High School to get a renovation. I will be discussing with my Board colleagues ways to speed up renovations at all our schools in the queue. At my urging, the Board will be reviewing the criteria by which renovations are prioritized at a June or July work session.

Here's the link to the CIP and background information:



Boundary Change Impact: One of the issues I plan to watch most closely this year is the impact of the boundary changes approved by the Board last year for AHS and schools feeding into the school at the Lacey site. As many of you know, I had tried to keep Wakefield Forest and/or Bren Mar Park west at AHS and remain concerned about the impact of moving these areas out of AHS. Fortunately, we were able to "grandfather" in all current students, so no one at AHS now will have to go to another school, as often happens in boundary changes. I am having ongoing conversations with FCPS staff and parents on ideas for helping students, families and the school as we move forward, both in the Annandale pyramid and at those schools affected by the "Lacey" decision.


Name for the New School at Lacey: Yesterday I toured the new school, still under construction, along with principal Brian Butler and a group of parents and community members. It's looking great!

Soon we'll no longer have to refer to the "school at the Lacey site," as we'll have a real name for our wonderful new elementary school. As a result of community input, I'm confident we will soon be receiving a recommendation from the Superintendent to consider two possible names for the elementary school, Mason Crest and Masonville.

The naming of the school will be put on the School Board agenda as New Business on Feb. 9 and will be voted on as an Action Item on Feb. 23. In the meantime, I look forward to getting more public input into the name, now that we are down to two candidates. I welcome hearing from PTAs, community associations, individual parents and community members. Please write to me at ssevans@fcps.edu. In addition, you may sign up to testify at the Feb. 9 and Feb. 23 School Board meetings to express your view. Signup starts at 6 am the Monday before the meeting. For more details and to sign up, here's the link: http://www.fcps.edu/schlbd/meetings/requestspeak.shtml


As background, a community meeting was held at Falls Church High School on Jan. 18 to discuss possible names of the new school and to have community members voice their preferences. Citizens brought forth nine names: Masonville, Mason Crest, Mason, Ruby Bridges, Crestview, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, Obama, Mason Hills and North Annandale. After two rounds of voting, Mason Crest emerged as the top vote getter and Masonville as the second.


I appreciate all the thoughtfulness that went into the naming process. As your Mason District School Board member, I'm happy to see that whichever way we go, "Mason" will remain in the school's name.


Honors Classes: At our Jan. 26 meeting, the School Board voted 11 to 1 to include five specific Honors classes in the high school course curriculum for the 2012-2013 school year. The vote was part of a larger discussion about whether we should have a two-tier or three-tier system for our students. In recent years, the school system had been eliminating Honors classes where Advanced Placement (AP) courses were available, leaving students to choose between standard-level and AP (college level) courses. Many students, parents and advocates came to us to say they needed a middle offering between standard-level and AP courses.

I strongly supported inclusion of the Honors courses. Students shouldn't have to choose between being overwhelmed or bored, which was what was happening to some of our students. One of my objections to the two-track system was that too many students were being pushed into college-level courses and then doing poorly in them and/or getting very low scores on the final standardized AP test. I did not buy the argument that a student was better off taking an AP course and doing poorly in it than doing well in an Honors level course. That reasoning defies common sense, research and what parents and students themselves were telling us.



The Board also decided to take a broader look at the issue at a work session in February, including how International Baccalaureate (IB) programs will be handled. I support offering several levels so that each student can choose which is right for himself/herself. We need to encourage all students to take courses that challenge them without setting them up for failure.


School Lunches: I've  been working with a group called Real Food for Kids, which is advocating for healthier school lunches, such as more fresh fruits and vegetables, fewer preservatives, salad bars and freshly cooked food. The Board will get a report soon on the results of a Nutrition Task Force and will consider a request that we do an assessment of our food services.

Biking, Walking, Bus Safety Education: The Board last month approved my amendment to retain and expand our safety education for students walking, biking and taking the bus to school. I worked on the amendment with the Safe Routes to Schools citizens group.

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

School Board Update

News for 2012:
FY2013 Budget, Capital Improvements,  
Name for New ES 

 
Dear Friends,

Happy New Year! I hope everyone had a wonderful holiday season.

January is a very busy time for the School Board, as we consider the Capital Improvement Program and begin work on the budget. This year we start as a brand-new Board, all of us elected in November to four-year terms, including six new members. This Board will have a particularly important task this year of starting a search for a new Superintendent to replace Dr. Jack Dale, retiring in June 2013.

As we are a new Board, I also anticipate that we will revisit our goals and processes, so this should be an exciting and busy year. As always, I will look to parents, teachers, students, and community members for your input on the major decisions we will be making to move our stellar school system forward.

We will have any number of issues and proposals to discuss this year, and I'll outline more of them in future newsletters, but this time I'm going to focus on the major pieces we will be taking up right away. If you have issues you want to bring to the Board, please don't hesitate to let me know or to testify before the Board at one of our regular meetings or at budget hearings.

Budget Timeline:
The Superintendent announces his proposed FY2013 Budget on Jan. 12, starting a budget process that ends in May.

The School Board will hold public hearings on the budget on Jan. 30 and 31. Those wanting to speak may start signing up on Jan. 13 by going to this link:  http://www.fcps.edu/schlbd/meetings/requestspeak.shtml  

The School Board will hold a budget work session on Feb. 2, when Board members will discuss amendments they would like to make to the Superintendent's plan. On Feb. 9 the Board will approve an Advertised budget to send to the Board of Supervisors. After the Board of Supervisors determines in April how much the county transfer to FCPS will be, the Board will approve a final budget in May.

The budget plan is important because it shows where any increased emphasis will be, new or expanded programs and any funding cuts. As Budget Vice Chair,  I will be even more deeply involved in the process this year.

Capital Improvement Program:
The big news this year is that the CIP includes a plan to build another new elementary school in Mason District. Several of our schools in Mason remain overcrowded, especially Bailey's Elementary School for the Arts and Sciences, with most requiring trailers to use as classrooms.  FCPS expects to see continuing increases in student enrollment, particularly in our area.

Here's the link to the CIP and background information:

CIP hearings will be held at 6 pm on Mon., Jan. 9.  The Board has scheduled a work session on Monday, Jan. 23, and will vote on the CIP at its business meeting on Thursday, Jan. 26.

To sign up to testify on Jan. 9, here is the link:


Falls Church High School: FCHS is in desperate need of a renovation but at this point is not scheduled for one any time soon. One of my goals is to figure out how to move renovation plans forward at this school, and I have been having discussions with colleagues and other leaders on this issue.

Parents at FCHS recently formed a group called UPROAR to raise awareness of the major facilities needs at this school and to advocate for a renovation. I applaud their efforts and look forward to working with them. If you would like to be involved in this effort, please let me know and I will connect you to UPROAR leaders.

Naming the New Elementary School at Lacey Site:
Soon we will have a name for our brand-new elementary school at the Lacey Center site. How nice it will be to finally call it by its own name! The School Board ultimately approves the name for the school, but first we want to get the community's input and proposals.

A public meeting has been scheduled at 7 pm, Wed., Jan. 18 at Falls Church High School to consider suggestions. After community input and a recommendation from the Superintendent, the Board will approve the name. I'm hoping this can be completed in February.

If you would like to propose a name for the new school, please plan to attend the Jan. 18 meeting to make a formal recommendation.  (If you cannot attend the meeting but wish to submit a name for consideration at the meeting, send an email with the proposed school name to cluster3admin@fcps.edu   no later than January 16th.)  Please keep in mind that elementary schools usually are given geographical or historical names. Anyone attending the meeting may suggest a name for consideration, and will be given an opportunity to make a presentation. After all recommendations have been presented, community members that reside within the school boundaries will be asked to vote for their preferred choices. Please bring proof of residency (such as a drivers license) if you would like to vote. Each residing household will be allowed one vote for the first, one vote for the second, and one vote for the third choice names. More than one round of voting may be needed to reduce the number of suggested names to an agreed upon number before taking the final vote.

If you have questions, please contact the Cluster III office at 571-423-1130. To view the full process for naming a new school, see Regulation 8170:


Web Site: Keep informed on news about the school by visiting the recently reactivated "Lacey" web site: http://www.fcps.edu/clusters/c3/LaceyES/index.html  


I'm looking forward to working with all of you in the coming year!


Sandy

Monday, December 19, 2011

School Board Update

Special Invitation: School Board Swearing In

You're Invited!

Please join me for my Swearing In for a new four-year term on the School Board.
Time:  7 pm
Date: Monday, Dec. 19

I'm honored to be starting a new term representing Mason District on the Fairfax County School Board. Come and see new members sworn in and take a photo with me.


Last community office hours of the year:
Time: 10:30 am - 12:30 pm
Date: TOMORROW, Sat. Dec. 17
Place: Thomas Jefferson Library

Del. Kaye Kory will be joining me!

Thursday, November 24, 2011

School Board Update

News: Superintendent Search, New School Board,  
"Lacey" Principal and PTA, Budget, Surveillance Cameras, Charter School Proposal and More! 

Dear Friends,

I hope you're enjoying a lovely fall and are looking forward to family and friends at Thanksgiving.

Here are some School Board news items and issues:

Superintendent Search:
As you know, Superintendent Dale has announced he will not be asking to renew his contract when it ends in June 2013. This means that one of the new Board's top priorities must be starting the process for the Superintendent Search. As a member of the School Board's Public Engagement Committee, I'll be involved in helping create the community input process for this effort, which will be critical in making sure our new superintendent is the right fit for our system in the future.

New School Board:
With the Nov. 8 elections, we will have a new 12-member School Board in January. I am honored to have been reelected to serve Mason District for a four-year term, and appreciate the confidence and faith you've shown in me by reelecting me.  Thank you, Mason District!

Five other incumbents were reelected: Janie Strauss (Dranesville), the current School Board chair; Ilryong Moon (At-Large), the current School Board vice chair; Dan Storck (Mt. Vernon); Patty Reed (Providence); and Kathy Smith (Sully). To see their bios, here is the link to the current School Board web page: http://www.fcps.edu/schlbd/members/bdmembers.shtml


Our new members include:  
Ryan McElveen (At-Large) http://www.ryanforschoolboard.com/
Ted Velkoff (At-Large) http://tv4sb.org/
Megan McLaughlin (Braddock), http://www.mclaughlinforschoolboard.com/
Pat Hynes (Hunter Mill), http://hynesforschoolboard.com/
Tammy Derenak Kaufax (Lee), http://kaufaxforschools.com/
Elizabeth Schultz (Springfield). http://www.elizabethschultzforschoolboard.com/

I'm including links to their campaign web sites, which include biographical information and issues they are interested in, so you can learn a bit about the newest members.

I welcome all newly elected members and look forward to working together in the next four years.

School Board Retreat: If you'd like to see members of the old Board and the new Board interact, please plan to attend our School Board all-day retreat on Sat. Dec. 10 at the Mt. Vernon Estate near Alexandria, starting at 8:30 am. As with all School Board meetings, it's open to the public (though it won't be televised or recorded, unfortunately.)

 "Lacey" Elementary School News:
I was pleased to tour the school construction site recently and can report that the project is going very well. We're on schedule for completion in the spring. The new school is set to open next fall with an estimated 500 students, and will grow as grandfathering of students at their old schools is completed.

Brian Butler Named Principal: The principal for the new elementary school will be Brian K. Butler, currently the principal at Mount Eagle Elementary School. Mr. Butler, whose appointment is effective Jan. 3, is a great match for this school. He brings with him many years of experience as an educator in FCPS and, before that, in Arlington County. Here is his Letter to the Community upon receiving the appointment:  http://www.fcps.edu/clusters/c3/LaceyES/docs/principallettertocommunity112111.pdf

To meet Mr. Butler and welcome him to our new school, please join me at Annandale Terrace Elementary School on Tuesday, Nov. 29, at 7 pm or Tuesday, Dec. 6, at Woodburn Elementary School, also at 7 pm.

Web Site: For more information about what's going on with the new school, including a general timeline, please visit the newly reactivated "Lacey" web site: http://www.fcps.edu/clusters/c3/LaceyES/index.html


PTA Forming: Parents have already started working on creating a PTA at the school. About 35 parents from the four schools feeding into "Lacey" attended a planning meeting on Nov. 15 at Falls Church High School. (If you're one of the parents whose students will be attending the new school, you should have received a notice of the meeting through your child's current school.) Fairfax County Council of PTAs President Ramona Morrow, who conducted the meeting and explained the process of creating a new PTA, said our school is getting an earlier start than most.  A PTA Planning Committee is being formed, and Mrs. Morrow is helping to organize that effort. Anyone wanting to participate, please email Mrs. Morrow at president@fccpta.org .

What will the school be named? Now that Mr. Butler has been appointed, he and I and the Cluster Assistant Superintendent will work on community engagement to get input into what the school should be named. We will be looking to the four school communities with families moving to the school (Beech Tree, Belvedere, Woodburn and Annandale Terrace) as well as to the neighborhoods feeding into the school, such as Broyhill Crest. Elementary school names generally have geographic or historical names, by the way.  I will be back in touch about this process, which we hope to complete by February or March, and families will get information about it through Keep In Touches and backpack letters. Ultimately, after consulting with the community and getting recommendations from the Superintendent, the School Board will vote on the new name.

Budget Priorities:
The School Board recently set budget priorities to guide Superintendent Dale in creating his budget recommendation, to come to the Board in January.  Among the top priorities are: class size, including the needs-based staffing formula that's so important to our schools with large numbers of needy students; teacher pay and workload; and core academics.

The budget outlook isn't as bad as it was two years ago or last year but we're still facing serious budget concerns, including a significant projected increase in our number of students.

The Superintendent will provide his budget recommendations in January. The School Board will hold budget hearings on Jan. 30 and 31 and Feb. 1. We will approve an Advertised Budget to send to the Board of Supervisors in early February.

Student Leadership Development Program: The School Board approved a new Student Leadership Development Program for students interested in learning more about how the school system is governed. The program is open to high school sophomores and juniors, and each School Board member will choose one student to participate. Applications are being taken now by principals, who will make recommendations to School Board members.

To learn more, see this link:


Special Topic: Surveillance Cameras:

It looks like this School Board will be taking a vote on the issue of putting surveillance cameras inside our high schools in December, and most likely will approve them. I believe this issue, which is an important one, should be decided by the Board that was just elected rather than the outgoing Board, but a majority of this Board wanted to make the decision before the end of the year.

After much thought, I will be voting against putting surveillance cameras inside the schools. Here are my objections:
            We have no measurable goal for why we want to install cameras in cafeterias and a few high-traffic "hot spots" in the schools. Staff acknowledges that we have no way of determining if the cameras are effective or not. Their expectation is that it would deter bad behavior and/or serve as proof of what happened during an incident. But no studies or evidence backs up the assertion that it is a deterrent.
            This costs money, an estimated total of $885,000 for school cafeterias and selected "hot spots." While we're told these are "noninstructional funds," what does that really mean? It's money from a high school's account that could be used for other needs at that school. Many parents and teachers are telling me they can think of better uses of these funds at their schools than putting in surveillance cameras in a hallway or two--school supplies for kids in need, reducing athletic fees, adding a salad bar with fresh food, to name a few that have been mentioned.
            Since none of the high schools suggest surveillance throughout the school (which would cost $120,000 per school), but only in a few spots, bad behavior could just move to another hallway. Since they are proposed for high-traffic areas, they won't impact incidents that take place in out-of-the-way, harder-to-monitor areas.
            We still don't have strong enough parent notification rules in our schools. Until we have this in place, so parents are notified before students are asked to write out statements that can serve as confessions in discipline hearings, I worry about adding more tools designed to help us punish students.
            Adding surveillance cameras does change the school environment. Students have raised this issue repeatedly during discussions of the issue, the sense that surveillance cameras destroy a fundamental sense of trust at a school.
            The rationale has gone from a concern about food fights in a few high schools last year to the notion that this will prevent another Columbine or terrorist attack. First of all, Columbine High School HAD surveillance cameras, and they did not avert that tragedy. If violent attacks are really the issue, why are the cameras only proposed for high schools?
            Another rationale is that the community uses our facilities after hours and that we need to protect the schools and students from errant community members. If that's a major concern, why are these not being suggested for elementary and middle schools, which are routinely made available for community use, as well.
           
Parents, students and teachers who weighed in on this issue had a mixed reaction. In Mason District, the Annandale High School PTSA was opposed, the Stuart High School community was considered "split," and the Falls Church High School community was supportive. The Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology PTSA did a school-wide survey, with parents split but more than half opposed (53% to 47%), students overwhelmingly opposed (90%) and teachers split down the middle (50-50%).

Of course, I also believe it should be the just-elected Board that decides this. It appears that the current Board will approve the use of surveillance cameras inside our high schools. It's unclear what the new Board would do. School Board member Dan Storck and I plan to raise the issue again with the new Board regardless of the outcome of the December vote.

To see the proposal and the staff rationale for it, here is the link:

I appreciate the thoughtful views I received on this issue and welcome any others you have.

Fairfax Leadership Academy Charter School/
Falls Church High School:
An application for a charter school proposal, called the Fairfax Leadership Academy, has been sent to the Virginia Board of Education for review.  As currently proposed, the Academy would be located at the site of the current Graham Road Elementary School and would serve at-risk students in grades 7 through 12. It is designed to start in fall 2013 with 7th and 8th grade and then grow by a grade each year until it reaches 450 students.

The application has caused concerns within the Falls Church High School community, with fears that if approved the charter school would compete with the high school for students and would have a negative impact on FCHS.

First of all, I apologize to all concerned that I didn't alert you to the proposal sooner, as it was being developed, feeling as strongly as I do about transparency in all that we do. The plan wasn't a secret--it was discussed briefly at a public School Board work session last December, when the proposal was to put the charter school at the Willston Center--but it wasn't publicized, either.

I recently attended a FCHS PTSA meeting about the charter school idea and heard and understand the issues raised there. After the meeting, I consulted with FCPS staff about doing an impact study and have been assured that staff will be assessing all potential impacts as the proposal works its way through consideration.

Here's where the charter school stands. The application was filed with the Board of Education on Oct. 28. (If you would like to see the application, write to me at ssevans@fcps.edu )

The state board has set a discussion of the proposal for Feb. 22 at 2 pm in Richmond. The state board will review it and advise whether it meets the necessary requirements for going forward. If it does, it will then come to the Fairfax School Board for consideration. Fairfax Leadership is seeking tentative approval from the School Board in spring 2012 so it can start taking applications in December 2012 for a fall 2013 proposed opening for 7th and 8th graders.

The official process is just beginning, though a significant amount of preparatory work has been done. Parent, teacher, student and other community input will be important, and I'm glad the FCHS community has become involved.  

I was delighted to see the energy in the room at the PTSA meeting. Regardless of what happens with the charter school, we need to harness that energy for FCHS, and especially to work on getting it a much-needed renovation. That needs to be a priority goal, and I'm looking forward to working with UPROAR, the newly formed parent advocacy group, to bring more attention to FCHS and help make that happen.



Have a wonderful and safe Thanksgiving! One thing I'm thankful for is the support and thoughtfulness of the Mason District school community.

Sandy


Friday, October 14, 2011

School Board Update

Dear Friends,

I hope you're enjoying the fall weather and that the school year is going well for all of you. Here are some updates on School Board issues.

This Weekend! Education Summit on Customizing Public Education:
Come join the conversation about how to move to the next level of Customizing Public Education to suit your child's needs.
Time: 8 am - noon
Date: Sat., Oct. 15
Place: Woodson High School

Educators, parents and students join a panel on this subject. Breakout sessions will explore:
  • How to help students keep balance in their lives
  • Helping your student find his/her passion and gaining marketable skills
  • Student goal-setting and learning plans
For more details and to register (we'd like to hear from you, but still feel free to attend if you haven't registered): 
 
Surveillance Cameras in High Schools: Thanks to all of you who responded to my request for your comments on surveillance cameras.  All of the high schools are having dialogues with parents about this issue. I've attended two of them (at Falls Church HS and Thomas Jefferson HSST) to hear directly from parents, students and teachers. Annandale HS will have its dialogue at 6:30 pm on Tues., Oct. 18, and Stuart HS will hold a meeting on the subject at 7 pm, Monday, Oct. 24.  For my previous report on the issue, please go to my web site at  http://evansschoolboard.blogspot.com  
   
After we finish getting public input, which several of us on the Board felt was critical before considering this further, I will report back to you on how the School Board plans to proceed.

"Lacey" Principal Selection:  FCPS has started the process for choosing a principal for our wonderful new elementary school at the Lacey Center site by asking for parent and other community input on what type of principal will be the best match for this school.  Parent and staff perspectives are used to screen resumes and develop interview questions. What skills, experiences, and leadership characteristics are needed at the new school? What are key challenges and issues? To give your input, please write to beth.boivin@fcps.edu.   
The deadline for comments is Oct. 12.

The principal panel, consisting of parents and staff from the four schools where incoming students are attending now (Annandale Terrace, Woodburn, Beech Tree and Belvedere), will meet on Nov. 1. The principal will be announced two or three weeks later.

After the principal is in place, we will start the process of choosing the name for the new school.

In the meantime, some parents are already starting to organize a PTA. If your students will be attending the new school and you'd like to participate in the PTA, please contact Monica Buckhorn at monica.buckhorn@verizon.net.

Ad Hoc Boundary Process: If you were part of the Annandale Regional Study and have ideas on how the process could be improved the next time we go through a boundary study, please email me with your comments (ssevans@fcps.edu).  

As the new chair of the Comprehensive Planning and Development Committee, I'll be asking for review of what worked well and what we can do better. I have ideas of my own, but want yours too!

High school students and parents:  
Have a wonderful Homecoming Week!

All the best,

Sandy


Sunday, September 25, 2011

School Board Update

What is Your View on Surveillance Cameras  
Inside Schools?

Dear Friends,

Last Monday, Fairfax County high school principals brought to the School Board a proposal to allow them to install surveillance cameras inside high schools.

I would like to get your views on this proposal.

While the high school principals said they were unanimous in wanting this measure as a matter of safety and security in the schools, others have argued that cameras would be an unwarranted intrusion and would just move problems to areas of the schools without surveillance.

I voiced several initial concerns. When I asked if parent or student views had been sought on this idea, it turns out there had been no meaningful effort to get input nor any plan to do so.  This is simply too important a change in policy not to have full discussion by parents, students, teachers and others.

After the meeting, I talked with Fairfax County Council of PTAs President Ramona Morrow about making sure all PTAs were informed of this proposal, so they could get it out to their school communities. I also plan to contact Mason District PTA presidents to make sure they know about it and can inform their parents.

Since the work session, there have been some efforts to get input. Superintendent Dale mentioned the proposal when he spoke to the Student Advisory Council (consisting of student representatives from all high schools) at their first session last week and said he would like their views. Some principals plan to discuss the proposal at upcoming PTA meetings.

My second concern was about what the goal is here and how we would measure effectiveness in achieving the goal. If prevention of problems, how do we determine success? Would this really be better at deterring incidents than having adults in charge throughout the school?

Or is this just about catching and punishing? If so, at the very least we first need to complete our reform of student discipline procedures. We have not finished that process yet. We still need stronger parent notification procedures, so that parents are called as soon as a student is suspected of a serious violation, not after the student has been extensively questioned and provided a written confession. I also want to see our students better informed of their basic civil rights when they are accused of serious offences at school, ones that can get them recommended for expulsion or face criminal charges.

How does this effort fit in with the school system's new emphasis on Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS) as a means of encouraging positive behavior through reinforcement? Some would argue this runs counter to that approach.

A bit of background on cameras in the school system. According to FCPS staff, we have cameras on all the school buses. We also installed cameras OUTSIDE schools to reduce vandalism and theft, and staff tell us this has been effective in deterring property damage and defacement. On the other hand, the school system piloted cameras in lunch lines a few years ago to reduce food theft, but there was no substantial reduction in theft, and the cameras were removed.

The most recent proposal was occasioned in part by food fights this spring in a few high school cafeterias, some of which caused significant damage.

The principals themselves have different ideas on what they want to do if allowed to install cameras. Some want them just in the cafeteria. Others want them in "hot spots," such as hallways and lobbies. None are suggesting putting them in classrooms, and bathrooms and locker rooms would be off limits. Cost ranges from $8,000 per school for just the cafeteria to $120,000 per school to have surveillance throughout the school (with cafeteria plus "hot spots" being somewhere in between).

and for data for specific high schools. There was also a piece on the front page of The Washington Post about it Sunday. 

As you can tell, I have several significant concerns about this proposal but want to know your views. Please let me hear from you by writing to me at ssevans@fcps.edu.

Thank you for your feedback.

Cordially,

Sandy

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

School Board Update

Dear Friends,

Welcome back to a brand-new school year!  I look forward to working with you this coming year to make your school and our school system better than ever. 

Some of my priorities for this Fall include:
  • Creating an ombudsman role within FCPS to help parents and others navigate their way around the school system and its processes. My proposal is coming up for discussion at a School Board Forum this Thursday, when I will ask my colleagues to consider pursuing this idea to improve communications and transparency.
  • Continuing to reform student discipline procedures, especially parent notification requirements so parents will learn right away when their student is in serious trouble at school.
  • Keeping honors classes in high schools (and not merely online), rather than making students choose between standard-level and AP (college) level.
  • Establishing budget priorities that are classroom-focused. As the School Board's Budget vice chair, I will be involved in all aspects of budget decision-making.
  • Working with teachers on ways to reduce their administrative and other non-classroom-related burdens.
  • Making it easier to get a waiver of a full-day schedule for students wanting to take online classes rather than attend first or last periods of the day.
  • Finding other ways to create healthful school environments for our students, from truly adequate recess time for little ones to improved school meals to reduction of stress and depression among our teens.
  • Working with communities due to transition as a result of boundary changes next year to connect them with their new communities.

Annandale/"Lacey" Boundary Decisions: The School Board approved the boundaries of the new elementary school at the Lacey Center site and new boundaries to relieve overcrowding at Annandale High School (AHS), both set to go into effect in Fall 2012. Here is the link to the final decisions:

            Boundary changes are among the most difficult things the school system does, and this was no exception. However, we were able to achieve many goals that were important to Mason District students and parents: the AAP center stayed at Glasgow MS, no areas attending Glasgow/Stuart were reassigned to other middle or high schools, and the changes will relieve serious overcrowding at some of our elementary schools.
            Importantly, the boundary changes included liberal "grandfathering," something I strongly supported. This means that, despite the boundary changes, anyone entering 9th grade at AHS this year can continue through graduation, students entering middle school this year can stay at that middle school through 8th grade, and elementary students entering the top grade at their school in Fall 2012 will be able their last year at their old school.    
            New Elementary School: The new school at the Lacey site will draw from four  elementary schools: Annandale Terrace, Woodburn, Beech Tree and Belvedere.
            An amendment of mine to reassign the Columbia Pines neighborhood to Glasgow MS and Stuart HS, to put that area with its neighbors in Sleepy Hollow Woods, was successful.  I was also able to restore a small area back into the Belvedere ES boundary, since it is just across Sleepy Hollow Rd. from the school.
            This coming year I will be working with all the affected school communities for a smooth transition and to make sure we keep all our schools strong and vibrant after the change.
            AHS: I sponsored amendments to the Annandale boundaries that would have kept the Wakefield Forest ES area and part of the Bren Mar Park ES area at AHS, but both amendments failed (the first on a 6-6 vote and the second on an 4-8 vote).  As a result, Wakefield Forest will be reassigned to Woodson HS and Bren Mar Park to Edison HS. At the School Board meeting, I voiced serious concerns about the future of AHS with both of these vibrant areas removed. As a result of the Board's failure to keep either of these areas at AHS, I ultimately could not support the boundary changes and voted against the package.
            Despite this, I remain confident in our ability as a school system and a community to work together to overcome challenges and move forward. In particular, I will be working with the Bren Mar Park area to connect them with their new friends at Edison HS. This is a wonderful high school, in the process of completing a beautiful renovation. I have already spoken with the highly regarded Edison principal, Greg Croghan, about ways to make these connections through this school year. I can report that Mr. Croghan was very enthusiastic about welcoming Bren Mar Park into the Edison family.
            A final note as we wind up more than a year of debating these boundaries. I couldn't be more proud of a community than I am of Mason District. Over the years I've watched quite a few boundary deliberations and seen many of them  turn truly ugly. This didn't happen here. I believe this is a tribute to our community, which understands and embraces different viewpoints.  Despite strong emotions and some difficult and contentious decisions (some of which I strongly disagreed with myself), our community members maintained their civility while advocating strongly and rationally. Well done!

Future Boundary Studies: We did learn from this experience. As the new chair of the Comprehensive Planning Development Committee (CPDC), I plan to make proposals for future ad hoc regional boundary studies to improve on this effort. One will be to officially include all elementary schools that could potentially be reassigned from their MS or HS, rather than rely on parents at the MS/HS level to represent them. (If that had been done last year, Bren Mar Park, Parklawn and Weyanoke ES and all other ES feeding to AHS would have had representatives in the Annandale Regional Study.) Also, I'm going to suggest more time between the release of Options and community dialogues, and between community dialogues and the final staff recommendation. This would give parents and other community members more time to absorb and respond to specific suggestions. Have other recommendations as a result of the Annandale Regional Study?  Email me at ssevans@fcps.edu

Please remember to come visit me at my community office hours or email me to let me know your views on issues or concerns.

   In the meantime, here's to a great 2011-12 School Year!

All the best,

Sandy